Claim of Thumberg v. Roejohn Associates, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Thumberg v. Roejohn Associates, Inc.

255 A.D. 910, 7 N.Y.S.2d 675, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5838

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 16, 1938

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 255 A.D. 910 (Claim of Thumberg v. Roejohn Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Thumberg v. Roejohn Associates, Inc., 255 A.D. 910, 7 N.Y.S.2d 675, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5838 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an award for disability benefits on account of an injury causing a strain to claimant’s back. The accident happened on November 6, 1935, while he was employed by the employer-appellant herein. He had sustained a previous accident and injury to his back on May 25, 1934, while in the employ of a previous employer. Appellants claim the later disability was connected with the previous accident and that the award should have been made against both employers and their carriers. The Board held that the later disability was solely the result of the second accident, and the evidence supports such finding. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an award for disability benefits on account of an injury causing a strain to claimant’s back. The accident happened on November 6, 1935, while he was employed by the employer-appellant herein. He had sustained a previous accident and injury to his back on May 25, 1934, while in the employ of a previous employer. Appellants claim the later disability was connected with the previous accident and that the award should have been made against both employers and their carriers. The Board held that the later disability was solely the result of the second accident, and the evidence supports such finding. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D. 910, 7 N.Y.S.2d 675, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-thumberg-v-roejohn-associates-inc-nyappdiv-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack