Claim of Thompson v. Quigley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Thompson v. Quigley

260 A.D. 824, 22 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4845

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 18, 1940

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 260 A.D. 824 (Claim of Thompson v. Quigley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Thompson v. Quigley, 260 A.D. 824, 22 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4845 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

The employer and her insurance carrier have appealed from an award of the State Industrial Board in claimant’s favor. The employer was engaged in operating office buildings in Herkimer, N. Y. On June 26, 1939, the claimant, a painter by trade, while painting the halls of the employer’s premises, fell from a plank on which he was standing and sustained the injuries in question. The only issue raised is whether claimant was an employee or an independent contractor. The finding of the State Industrial Board that claimant was an employee is sustained by the evidence. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffernan, Schenck and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The employer and her insurance carrier have appealed from an award of the State Industrial Board in claimant’s favor. The employer was engaged in operating office buildings in Herkimer, N. Y. On June 26, 1939, the claimant, a painter by trade, while painting the halls of the employer’s premises, fell from a plank on which he was standing and sustained the injuries in question. The only issue raised is whether claimant was an employee or an independent contractor. The finding of the State Industrial Board that claimant was an employee is sustained by the evidence. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffernan, Schenck and Foster, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D. 824, 22 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-thompson-v-quigley-nyappdiv-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack