Claim of Thomas v. Barone Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Thomas v. Barone Realty Corp.

259 A.D. 946, 19 N.Y.S.2d 819, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7387

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D. 946 (Claim of Thomas v. Barone Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Thomas v. Barone Realty Corp., 259 A.D. 946, 19 N.Y.S.2d 819, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7387 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Claimant has appealed from a decision of the State Industrial Board disallowing a claim on the ground that the accident did not arise out of and in the course of her employment. Claimant was employed as a caretaker in an apartment house in the borough of Manhattan. It is her claim that on the 30th day of January, 1937, she sustained injuries by falling out of a window. There were three trials before the same referee. The referee found that the testimony of claimant was incredible and likewise the testimony of her witnesses. On review of the case the State Industrial Board dismissed the claim. The evidence sustains the determination. Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffernan, Schenek and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claimant has appealed from a decision of the State Industrial Board disallowing a claim on the ground that the accident did not arise out of and in the course of her employment. Claimant was employed as a caretaker in an apartment house in the borough of Manhattan. It is her claim that on the 30th day of January, 1937, she sustained injuries by falling out of a window. There were three trials before the same referee. The referee found that the testimony of claimant was incredible and likewise the testimony of her witnesses. On review of the case the State Industrial Board dismissed the claim. The evidence sustains the determination. Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffernan, Schenek and Foster, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D. 946, 19 N.Y.S.2d 819, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-thomas-v-barone-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1940.