Claim of Temes v. Lauder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Temes v. Lauder

261 A.D. 1009, 25 N.Y.S.2d 842, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8531

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 5, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 261 A.D. 1009 (Claim of Temes v. Lauder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Temes v. Lauder, 261 A.D. 1009, 25 N.Y.S.2d 842, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8531 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Application by appellant for an order directing the State Industrial Board to amend its findings, for leave to submit a short record, and to extend appellant’s time to prepare a record on appeal. This court has no power upon motion to direct the State Industrial Board to amend its findings, and will not assume to determine what should be omitted from the record or condensed therein. The record on appeal should be settled in the first instance by the Board or by stipulation between the parties. (Matter of MacConel v. Union Coal & Ash Co., 230 App. Div. 336.) Any alleged errors in connection therewith may be reviewed on appeal. Application denied, [1010]*1010without costs in all respects, except that appellant’s time to perfect his record on appeal is extended to April 15, 1941. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application by appellant for an order directing the State Industrial Board to amend its findings, for leave to submit a short record, and to extend appellant’s time to prepare a record on appeal. This court has no power upon motion to direct the State Industrial Board to amend its findings, and will not assume to determine what should be omitted from the record or condensed therein. The record on appeal should be settled in the first instance by the Board or by stipulation between the parties. (Matter of MacConel v. Union Coal & Ash Co., 230 App. Div. 336.) Any alleged errors in connection therewith may be reviewed on appeal. Application denied, [1010]*1010without costs in all respects, except that appellant’s time to perfect his record on appeal is extended to April 15, 1941. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Foster, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D. 1009, 25 N.Y.S.2d 842, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-temes-v-lauder-nyappdiv-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack