Claim of Teles v. Westbury S & S Concrete Inc.
357 N.E.2d 1021, 40 N.Y.2d 902, 389 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3074
This text of 357 N.E.2d 1021 (Claim of Teles v. Westbury S & S Concrete Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Claim of Teles v. Westbury S & S Concrete Inc., 357 N.E.2d 1021, 40 N.Y.2d 902, 389 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3074 (N.Y. 1976).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs, on the memorandum at the Appellate Division (50 AD2d 954).
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke. Judge Jasen dissents and votes to reverse for the reasons stated in the dissenting [904]*904memorandum by Mr. Justice T. Paul Kane at the Appellate Division.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Claim of Neacosia v. New York Power Authority
649 N.E.2d 1188 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
Claim of Neacosia v. New York Power Authority
205 A.D.2d 945 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Claim of Broich v. New York State Union College of Optometry
117 A.D.2d 868 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
357 N.E.2d 1021, 40 N.Y.2d 902, 389 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3074, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-teles-v-westbury-s-s-concrete-inc-ny-1976.