Claim of Teles v. Westbury S & S Concrete Inc.

357 N.E.2d 1021, 40 N.Y.2d 902, 389 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3074
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 26, 1976·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs, on the memorandum at the Appellate Division (50 AD2d 954).

Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke. Judge Jasen dissents and votes to reverse for the reasons stated in the dissenting [904]*904memorandum by Mr. Justice T. Paul Kane at the Appellate Division.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Teles v. Westbury S & S Concrete Inc., 357 N.E.2d 1021, 40 N.Y.2d 902, 389 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3074 (N.Y. 1976).

357 N.E.2d 1021 (Claim of Teles v. Westbury S & S Concrete Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Neacosia v. New York Power Authority
649 N.E.2d 1188 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
Claim of Neacosia v. New York Power Authority
205 A.D.2d 945 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Claim of Broich v. New York State Union College of Optometry
117 A.D.2d 868 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)