Claim of Tanenhaus v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Tanenhaus v. City of New York

256 A.D. 862, 9 N.Y.S.2d 175, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5168

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 18, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D. 862 (Claim of Tanenhaus v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Tanenhaus v. City of New York, 256 A.D. 862, 9 N.Y.S.2d 175, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5168 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an award of the State Industrial Board, noticed March 4, 1938. The claimant was partially disabled between June 1, 1937, and September 21, 1937. She was awarded eight dollars per week as reduced earnings. At the time of disablement claimant was earning $27.69 a week, as found by the Board. Between the dates of partial disablement, for which the award was made, namely, sixteen weeks, claimant earned $284.96, or at the rate of $17.81 per week. This, added to the weekly amount of the award, aggregated $25.81, an amount less than the claimant was earning at the time of the accident. The award was not made in contravention of subdivisions 5 and 6 of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an award of the State Industrial Board, noticed March 4, 1938. The claimant was partially disabled between June 1, 1937, and September 21, 1937. She was awarded eight dollars per week as reduced earnings. At the time of disablement claimant was earning $27.69 a week, as found by the Board. Between the dates of partial disablement, for which the award was made, namely, sixteen weeks, claimant earned $284.96, or at the rate of $17.81 per week. This, added to the weekly amount of the award, aggregated $25.81, an amount less than the claimant was earning at the time of the accident. The award was not made in contravention of subdivisions 5 and 6 of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D. 862, 9 N.Y.S.2d 175, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-tanenhaus-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1939.