Claim of Tait v. Town of Delhi
191 N.E.2d 466, 13 N.Y.2d 656
This text of 191 N.E.2d 466 (Claim of Tait v. Town of Delhi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Claim of Tait v. Town of Delhi, 191 N.E.2d 466, 13 N.Y.2d 656 (N.Y. 1963).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke and Foster. Judges Van Voorhis and Scileppi dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the ground that claimant under the evidence was an independent contractor as a matter of law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
191 N.E.2d 466, 13 N.Y.2d 656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-tait-v-town-of-delhi-ny-1963.