Claim of Szweczuk v. Bethlehem Steel Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Szweczuk v. Bethlehem Steel Co.

18 A.D.2d 1111, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4005

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 4, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 1111 (Claim of Szweczuk v. Bethlehem Steel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Szweczuk v. Bethlehem Steel Co., 18 A.D.2d 1111, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4005 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

In this claimant’s appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board denying application for settlement of a shortened record on appeal, there is no demonstration that a consideration of the entire record is not necessary for adequate review on appeal. Although claimant argued a shortened record would be sufficient, the board has found “ that the entire record is pertinent to the issues” and we accept that finding. Since permission has been granted claimant to appeal as a poor person, such aid as may be reasonable should be afforded to him by the board in getting together the required papers for the appeal. Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In this claimant’s appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board denying application for settlement of a shortened record on appeal, there is no demonstration that a consideration of the entire record is not necessary for adequate review on appeal. Although claimant argued a shortened record would be sufficient, the board has found “ that the entire record is pertinent to the issues” and we accept that finding. Since permission has been granted claimant to appeal as a poor person, such aid as may be reasonable should be afforded to him by the board in getting together the required papers for the appeal. Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 1111, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-szweczuk-v-bethlehem-steel-co-nyappdiv-1963.