Claim of Swirsky v. Brooklyn Ambulance Service

3 A.D.2d 785, 160 N.Y.S.2d 21, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6195
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 14, 1957
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 A.D.2d 785 (Claim of Swirsky v. Brooklyn Ambulance Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Swirsky v. Brooklyn Ambulance Service, 3 A.D.2d 785, 160 N.Y.S.2d 21, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6195 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Opinion

Appeal by the Special Fund for Reopened Cases from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Claimant sustained three separate back injuries, on October 11,1941, January 2, 1944 and February 16, 1950, respectively. Following the last accident the board has found that claimant has a permanent partial disability due to all three accidents, and in making an award for reduced earnings allocated 50% of the disability to the first accident, which is chargeable to appellant. At the time of the first accident claimant was earning $35 weekly; at the time of the second accident $60 weekly, and at the time of the third accident $71.06 weekly. In computing the reduced earnings the board has used only the last figure. Appellant’s only contention is that the board was wrong in adopting a rate of compensation based upon claimant’s earnings at the time of the last injury, and contends that the provisions of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law require that claimant’s wages at the time of the prior injuries should be the basis of computation of reduced earnings. There is no substantial distinction between this case and Matter of Braunstein v. General Marine Repair (307 N. Y. 296), and the principles enunciated are controlling here. Upon the authority of the Braunstein ease the decision and award are affirmed, with one bill of costs to be divided between the respondent-carrier filing a brief and the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals is granted to appellant. Foster, P.J., Coon, Halpern and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. SD Warren, Div. of Scott Paper
432 A.2d 431 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 A.D.2d 785, 160 N.Y.S.2d 21, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-swirsky-v-brooklyn-ambulance-service-nyappdiv-1957.