Claim of Suskind v. Teitelbaum Baking Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Suskind v. Teitelbaum Baking Co.

244 A.D. 854

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

Claimant, a chauffeur, was burned following an explosion of gasoline. The proof sustains the finding of total disability during the period covered by the award. His previous wages were thirty-five debars a week. Award of twenty-two dollars weekly during minority was made, The carrier stipulated that the minor’s wages would have increased sufficiently to make twentyffive dollars weekly award proper, Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J„ Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Heffeman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claimant, a chauffeur, was burned following an explosion of gasoline. The proof sustains the finding of total disability during the period covered by the award. His previous wages were thirty-five debars a week. Award of twenty-two dollars weekly during minority was made, The carrier stipulated that the minor’s wages would have increased sufficiently to make twentyffive dollars weekly award proper, Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J„ Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Heffeman, JJ.

Claim of Suskind v. Teitelbaum Baking Co., 244 A.D. 854 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

244 A.D. 854 (Claim of Suskind v. Teitelbaum Baking Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.