Claim of Sullivan v. Rochester Smelting & Refining Co.
This text of 252 A.D. 712 (Claim of Sullivan v. Rochester Smelting & Refining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The award is for lead poisoning. The evidence sustains the award. Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Crapser, J., dissents, and votes to reverse, on the ground that the disability shown by the proof is confined to a particular industry; that does not justify an award.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 A.D. 712, 299 N.Y.S. 293, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-sullivan-v-rochester-smelting-refining-co-nyappdiv-1937.