Claim of Sucammele v. Brooklyn Rapid Transit Corp.

229 A.D. 812

This text of 229 A.D. 812 (Claim of Sucammele v. Brooklyn Rapid Transit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Sucammele v. Brooklyn Rapid Transit Corp., 229 A.D. 812 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The partial permanent disability of claimant is established both by the period of time it has existed, by the testimony of Dr. Reed, and the conclusions to be drawn from the testimony of other physicians. However, there seems to be a steady improvement in some respects, and considerable testimony concerning a greater earning capacity. Before another award is made further testimony as to claimant’s earning capacity should be taken. Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Davis, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur. Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
229 A.D. 812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-sucammele-v-brooklyn-rapid-transit-corp-nyappdiv-1930.