Claim of Struzycki v. R. W. Smith Contracting Co.
195 A.D. 945
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1921·Published
Opinions
All concur, except Kiley, J., dissenting, with a memorandum.
See Struzycki v. Smith Contracting Co. (20 State Dept. Rep. 410).— [Rep.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Struzycki v. R. W. Smith Contracting Co., 195 A.D. 945 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1921).
195 A.D. 945 (Claim of Struzycki v. R. W. Smith Contracting Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re the Estate of Miller
18 N.E. 139 (New York Court of Appeals, 1888)
G. W. Ry. Co. v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.
57 N.E. 498 (New York Court of Appeals, 1900)
Quinlan v. . Welch
36 N.E. 12 (New York Court of Appeals, 1894)
Kelly v. Mulcahy
131 A.D. 639 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
People ex rel. New York Edison Co. v. Willcox
151 A.D. 832 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)
Claim of Moran v. Rodgers & Hagerty, Inc.
180 A.D. 821 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)
Bailey v. Kincaid
11 N.Y.S. 294 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)