Claim of Stokes v. Permanente

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Stokes v. Permanente

198 A.D.2d 639, 603 N.Y.S.2d 625, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10524

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 198 A.D.2d 639 (Claim of Stokes v. Permanente) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Stokes v. Permanente, 198 A.D.2d 639, 603 N.Y.S.2d 625, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10524 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeals from a decision and an amended decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed May 14, 1992 and December 21, 1992, which ruled that claimant sustained a compensable injury and awarded workers’ compensation benefits.

Claimant was injured when she was struck by a car while crossing a street from the parking lot where she normally [640]*640parked to her place of employment. We find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that claimant was injured while engaging in an act which was part of the entrance into the employment premises and that the injury therefore arose out of and in the course of her employment.

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision and amended decision are affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeals from a decision and an amended decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed May 14, 1992 and December 21, 1992, which ruled that claimant sustained a compensable injury and awarded workers’ compensation benefits.

Claimant was injured when she was struck by a car while crossing a street from the parking lot where she normally [640]*640parked to her place of employment. We find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that claimant was injured while engaging in an act which was part of the entrance into the employment premises and that the injury therefore arose out of and in the course of her employment.

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision and amended decision are affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 A.D.2d 639, 603 N.Y.S.2d 625, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-stokes-v-permanente-nyappdiv-1993.