Claim of Starace v. International Terminal Operating Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Starace v. International Terminal Operating Co.

39 A.D.2d 613, 330 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4839

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 20, 1972

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 39 A.D.2d 613 (Claim of Starace v. International Terminal Operating Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Starace v. International Terminal Operating Co., 39 A.D.2d 613, 330 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4839 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed March 23, 1971, as amended by a supplemental decision of said board, filed May 28,1971. Claimant, a steadily hired checker at Pier 7 located at the foot of Atlantic Avenue at the East River in Brooklyn, fell on his way to work upon a sidewalk very close to the gate at the entrance leading into the premises where the employer supplied services as a contract stevedore, which was the sole entrance used by claimant in entering and exiting from the place of work. At this point Atlantic Avenue is a dead end street and, adjacent to said sidewalk and within a fenced enclosure upon the premises used by the employer, there is a guardhouse with a window overlooking the place of the fall. The record discloses that the gate, when opened, swings over and across the sidewalk and said spot where claimant received his injuries. The area is patrolled by the Port of New York Authority police (see L. 1921, eh. 154, § 1). The board had a right to find that claimant sustained an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment (cf. Matter of Podhoretz v. Rubinstein, 35 A D 2d 1042; Matter of Singer v. Rich Mar. Sales, 25 A D 2d 801; Matter of Brienza v. Le Chase Constr. Corp., 17 A D 2d 83). Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Staley, Jr., J. P., Cooke, Sweeney, Kane and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed March 23, 1971, as amended by a supplemental decision of said board, filed May 28,1971. Claimant, a steadily hired checker at Pier 7 located at the foot of Atlantic Avenue at the East River in Brooklyn, fell on his way to work upon a sidewalk very close to the gate at the entrance leading into the premises where the employer supplied services as a contract stevedore, which was the sole entrance used by claimant in entering and exiting from the place of work. At this point Atlantic Avenue is a dead end street and, adjacent to said sidewalk and within a fenced enclosure upon the premises used by the employer, there is a guardhouse with a window overlooking the place of the fall. The record discloses that the gate, when opened, swings over and across the sidewalk and said spot where claimant received his injuries. The area is patrolled by the Port of New York Authority police (see L. 1921, eh. 154, § 1). The board had a right to find that claimant sustained an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment (cf. Matter of Podhoretz v. Rubinstein, 35 A D 2d 1042; Matter of Singer v. Rich Mar. Sales, 25 A D 2d 801; Matter of Brienza v. Le Chase Constr. Corp., 17 A D 2d 83). Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Staley, Jr., J. P., Cooke, Sweeney, Kane and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 A.D.2d 613, 330 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-starace-v-international-terminal-operating-co-nyappdiv-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack