Claim of Spinks v. American Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Spinks v. American Manufacturing Co.

246 A.D. 875

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 246 A.D. 875 (Claim of Spinks v. American Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Spinks v. American Manufacturing Co., 246 A.D. 875 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an appeal by the employer, insured in the State Fund, as carrier, from an award and decision of the State Industrial Board which approves a previous decision of the Board. An appeal was taken and this court in March, 1935 [243 App. Div. 828], ordered that the award be reversed and the matter remitted to the State Industrial Board on the grounds that the review was not had before the entire Board, and the determination had not been concurred in by three members thereof. The award has now been confirmed and concurred in by the full Board. The appellant on behalf of the employer and carrier claims that their substantial rights have been prejudiced by not having notice of the acts of the Board. Notice was given of the determination of the Board, and this appeal has resulted. The reversal did not call for the reopening of the case and the procedure was in accordance with the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present-—-Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an appeal by the employer, insured in the State Fund, as carrier, from an award and decision of the State Industrial Board which approves a previous decision of the Board. An appeal was taken and this court in March, 1935 [243 App. Div. 828], ordered that the award be reversed and the matter remitted to the State Industrial Board on the grounds that the review was not had before the entire Board, and the determination had not been concurred in by three members thereof. The award has now been confirmed and concurred in by the full Board. The appellant on behalf of the employer and carrier claims that their substantial rights have been prejudiced by not having notice of the acts of the Board. Notice was given of the determination of the Board, and this appeal has resulted. The reversal did not call for the reopening of the case and the procedure was in accordance with the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present-—-Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D. 875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-spinks-v-american-manufacturing-co-nyappdiv-1936.