Claim of Speregon v. Downtown Delicatessen, Inc.

221 N.E.2d 171, 18 N.Y.2d 736, 274 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1106
New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 29, 1966·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, Avith costs; no opinion.

[738] Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Bubke, Bebgan and Keating. Judges Van Voobhis and Scileppi dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the following ground: There ivas insufficient medical testimony to establish a causal relationship. The operating neurosurgeon testified to no causal relationship and the only evidence adduced to support it was by an expert witness qualified only in other fields whose opinion was purely speculative.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Speregon v. Downtown Delicatessen, Inc., 221 N.E.2d 171, 18 N.Y.2d 736, 274 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1106 (N.Y. 1966).

221 N.E.2d 171 (Claim of Speregon v. Downtown Delicatessen, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Eppy v. Daily News
84 A.D.2d 599 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)