Home/New York Court of Appeals/Claim of Speregon v. Downtown Delicatessen, Inc.

Claim of Speregon v. Downtown Delicatessen, Inc.

221 N.E.2d 171, 18 N.Y.2d 736, 274 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1106
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 29, 1966
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 221 N.E.2d 171 (Claim of Speregon v. Downtown Delicatessen, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Speregon v. Downtown Delicatessen, Inc., 221 N.E.2d 171, 18 N.Y.2d 736, 274 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1106 (N.Y. 1966).

Opinion

Order affirmed, Avith costs; no opinion.

[738]*738Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Bubke, Bebgan and Keating. Judges Van Voobhis and Scileppi dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the following ground: There ivas insufficient medical testimony to establish a causal relationship. The operating neurosurgeon testified to no causal relationship and the only evidence adduced to support it was by an expert witness qualified only in other fields whose opinion was purely speculative.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Eppy v. Daily News
84 A.D.2d 599 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
221 N.E.2d 171, 18 N.Y.2d 736, 274 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-speregon-v-downtown-delicatessen-inc-ny-1966.