Claim of Sodamora v. F. C. Huyck & Sons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Sodamora v. F. C. Huyck & Sons

272 A.D.2d 1092

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 1092 (Claim of Sodamora v. F. C. Huyck & Sons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Sodamora v. F. C. Huyck & Sons, 272 A.D.2d 1092 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by employer and its insurance carrier, State Insurance Fund, from an award of compensation made by the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Claimant, employed in the office of the employer, suffered an accidental injury on her way to work. The sole question involved is whether claimant had reached the precincts of her employment so that it could be found that her accident arose out of and in the course of her employment. The board has found in claimant’s favor and there is evidence to sustain its finding. Award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Foster and Russell, JJ., concur; Brewster, J., taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by employer and its insurance carrier, State Insurance Fund, from an award of compensation made by the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Claimant, employed in the office of the employer, suffered an accidental injury on her way to work. The sole question involved is whether claimant had reached the precincts of her employment so that it could be found that her accident arose out of and in the course of her employment. The board has found in claimant’s favor and there is evidence to sustain its finding. Award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Foster and Russell, JJ., concur; Brewster, J., taking no part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 1092, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-sodamora-v-f-c-huyck-sons-nyappdiv-1947.