Claim of Smothers v. D. & M. Pharmacy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Smothers v. D. & M. Pharmacy

271 A.D.2d 760

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 18, 1946

StatusPublished

This text of 271 A.D.2d 760 (Claim of Smothers v. D. & M. Pharmacy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Smothers v. D. & M. Pharmacy, 271 A.D.2d 760 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the employer and carrier from awards and decision o‘f the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed May 18, 1945. The issue is whether the D. & M. Pharmacy, a copartnership, or George Lindsey, is the employer. The board has found that the copartnership was the employer. The record sustains the finding. Awards and decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the employer and carrier from awards and decision o‘f the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed May 18, 1945. The issue is whether the D. & M. Pharmacy, a copartnership, or George Lindsey, is the employer. The board has found that the copartnership was the employer. The record sustains the finding. Awards and decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-smothers-v-d-m-pharmacy-nyappdiv-1946.