Claim of Smith v. Marschner

240 A.D. 925

This text of 240 A.D. 925 (Claim of Smith v. Marschner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Smith v. Marschner, 240 A.D. 925 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Rhodes, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., and McNamee, J., dissent and vote to reverse the award and to dismiss the claim, on the ground that the evidence does not indicate a bona fide employment, and that the claimant at the time of the injury was engaged in painting the private residence of the alleged employer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
240 A.D. 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-smith-v-marschner-nyappdiv-1933.