Claim of Smith v. Marschner

240 A.D. 925

Opinion

Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Rhodes, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., and McNamee, J., dissent and vote to reverse the award and to dismiss the claim, on the ground that the evidence does not indicate a bona fide employment, and that the claimant at the time of the injury was engaged in painting the private residence of the alleged employer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Smith v. Marschner, 240 A.D. 925 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

240 A.D. 925 (Claim of Smith v. Marschner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.