Claim of Smith v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Smith v. City of New York

261 A.D. 860, 24 N.Y.S.2d 750, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7799

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 261 A.D. 860 (Claim of Smith v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Smith v. City of New York, 261 A.D. 860, 24 N.Y.S.2d 750, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7799 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Claimant, an aE-time employee as a trained nurse of the city of New York located and living in the nurses’ residence on Welfare Island, fainted while at the dining table and received bums upon her fingers which came in contact with hot food and hot plates upon the dining table upon which she feU. (Matter of Mausert v. Albany Builders Supply Co., 250 N. Y. 21; Matter of Andrews v. L. & S. Amusement Co., 253 id. 97.) Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. HiE, P. J., BEss, Heffeman and Poster, JJ., concur; Crapser, J., dissents and votes to reverse the award and to dismiss the claim on the ground that an injury from hot food eaten at the lunch hour is not compensable since it was not sustained in the course of the employment. (Matter of Kowalek v. New York Consolidated R. R. Co., 229 N. Y. 489; Matter of Heitz v. Ruppert, 218 id. 148.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claimant, an aE-time employee as a trained nurse of the city of New York located and living in the nurses’ residence on Welfare Island, fainted while at the dining table and received bums upon her fingers which came in contact with hot food and hot plates upon the dining table upon which she feU. (Matter of Mausert v. Albany Builders Supply Co., 250 N. Y. 21; Matter of Andrews v. L. & S. Amusement Co., 253 id. 97.) Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. HiE, P. J., BEss, Heffeman and Poster, JJ., concur; Crapser, J., dissents and votes to reverse the award and to dismiss the claim on the ground that an injury from hot food eaten at the lunch hour is not compensable since it was not sustained in the course of the employment. (Matter of Kowalek v. New York Consolidated R. R. Co., 229 N. Y. 489; Matter of Heitz v. Ruppert, 218 id. 148.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D. 860, 24 N.Y.S.2d 750, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-smith-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack