Claim of Smith v. Aerovane Utilities Corp.
This text of 233 A.D. 882 (Claim of Smith v. Aerovane Utilities Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Award reversed and claim dismissed, for want of jurisdiction, with costs against the State Industrial Board (Matter of Cameron v. Ellis Construction Co., 252 N. Y. 394; Matter of Copeland v. Foundation Co., 231 App. Div. 781; revd., 256 N. Y. 568); and because the employee when injured was not in the course of his employment. (Schultz v. Beaver Products Co., Inc., 223 App. Div. 582; affd., 250 N. Y. 565; Matter of Parisi v. Whitmore, Rauber & Vicinus, 230 App. Div. 140.) All concur, except Hill, J., who dissents and votes to affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
233 A.D. 882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-smith-v-aerovane-utilities-corp-nyappdiv-1931.