Home/New York Court of Appeals/Claim of Skinner v. Tobin Packing Co.

Claim of Skinner v. Tobin Packing Co.

221 N.E.2d 172, 18 N.Y.2d 738, 274 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1107
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 29, 1966
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 221 N.E.2d 172 (Claim of Skinner v. Tobin Packing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Skinner v. Tobin Packing Co., 221 N.E.2d 172, 18 N.Y.2d 738, 274 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1107 (N.Y. 1966).

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DesmoNd and Judges Fuld, Burke, Scileppi and Keating. Judge VAN Voorhis concurs upon the following ground: The requirement outlined in the opinion of Matter of Marks v. Gray (251 N. Y. 90) that the business errand should have prompted the trip appears to have been overruled in Matter of Mahoney v. Stern & Co. (9 N Y 2d 931), which holds that it is sufficient if the journey on which the accident occurred was to serve both a business and a private object. Taking no part: Judge BergaN.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Slack v. Livingston-Wyoming ARC, Inc.
294 A.D.2d 716 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
221 N.E.2d 172, 18 N.Y.2d 738, 274 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-skinner-v-tobin-packing-co-ny-1966.