Home/New York Court of Appeals/Claim of Skinner v. Tobin Packing Co.

Claim of Skinner v. Tobin Packing Co.

221 N.E.2d 172, 18 N.Y.2d 738, 274 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1107
New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 29, 1966·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DesmoNd and Judges Fuld, Burke, Scileppi and Keating. Judge VAN Voorhis concurs upon the following ground: The requirement outlined in the opinion of Matter of Marks v. Gray (251 N. Y. 90) that the business errand should have prompted the trip appears to have been overruled in Matter of Mahoney v. Stern & Co. (9 N Y 2d 931), which holds that it is sufficient if the journey on which the accident occurred was to serve both a business and a private object. Taking no part: Judge BergaN.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Skinner v. Tobin Packing Co., 221 N.E.2d 172, 18 N.Y.2d 738, 274 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1107 (N.Y. 1966).

221 N.E.2d 172 (Claim of Skinner v. Tobin Packing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Slack v. Livingston-Wyoming ARC, Inc.
294 A.D.2d 716 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)