Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Claim of Skeens v. L. F. Hicks Trucking Co.

Claim of Skeens v. L. F. Hicks Trucking Co.

20 A.D.2d 594, 245 N.Y.S.2d 167, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2653
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 20, 1963
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 A.D.2d 594 (Claim of Skeens v. L. F. Hicks Trucking Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Skeens v. L. F. Hicks Trucking Co., 20 A.D.2d 594, 245 N.Y.S.2d 167, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2653 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Opinion

Upon remittal after the prior appeal (15 A D 2d 694), the board found, in substance, that the cohabitation in Iowa was not with a present intent and agreement to establish a marriage. Intent is usually a matter of inference and always one for purely factual evaluation and determination and hence within the province of the board, whose finding upon this record cannot be disturbed. Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Mott v. Duncan Petroleum Trans.
72 A.D.2d 654 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 A.D.2d 594, 245 N.Y.S.2d 167, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-skeens-v-l-f-hicks-trucking-co-nyappdiv-1963.