Claim of Skeens v. L. F. Hicks Trucking Co.
20 A.D.2d 594, 245 N.Y.S.2d 167, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2653
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 20, 1963·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Upon remittal after the prior appeal (15 A D 2d 694), the board found, in substance, that the cohabitation in Iowa was not with a present intent and agreement to establish a marriage. Intent is usually a matter of inference and always one for purely factual evaluation and determination and hence within the province of the board, whose finding upon this record cannot be disturbed. Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Skeens v. L. F. Hicks Trucking Co., 20 A.D.2d 594, 245 N.Y.S.2d 167, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2653 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).
20 A.D.2d 594 (Claim of Skeens v. L. F. Hicks Trucking Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claim of Mott v. Duncan Petroleum Trans.
72 A.D.2d 654 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)