Claim of Simola v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Simola v. City of New York

271 A.D.2d 942

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 14, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 271 A.D.2d 942 (Claim of Simola v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Simola v. City of New York, 271 A.D.2d 942 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an appeal by the City of Hew York, a self-insured employer, from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board in favor of claimant. The contentions of the appellant are that the medical testimony is conjectural and that the board refused to grant a rehearing to permit the introduction of additional reports. Claimant was a registered nurse. Prom September 15, 1942, until her disablement on October 21, 1944, she worked for the City of Hew York as head nurse in the Triboro Hospital. Claimant had an unrelated tuberculosis history. Claimant was suffering from tuberculosis. The board found that disabling tuberculosis was causally related to her employment in the Triboro Hospital. The employer’s first report of injury admits that to be the fact. The evidence sustains the determination of the" board. Award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an appeal by the City of Hew York, a self-insured employer, from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board in favor of claimant. The contentions of the appellant are that the medical testimony is conjectural and that the board refused to grant a rehearing to permit the introduction of additional reports. Claimant was a registered nurse. Prom September 15, 1942, until her disablement on October 21, 1944, she worked for the City of Hew York as head nurse in the Triboro Hospital. Claimant had an unrelated tuberculosis history. Claimant was suffering from tuberculosis. The board found that disabling tuberculosis was causally related to her employment in the Triboro Hospital. The employer’s first report of injury admits that to be the fact. The evidence sustains the determination of the" board. Award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-simola-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1947.