Claim of Simmons v. Otis Elevator Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Simmons v. Otis Elevator Co.

268 A.D. 808, 48 N.Y.S.2d 563, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3567

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 3, 1944

StatusPublished

This text of 268 A.D. 808 (Claim of Simmons v. Otis Elevator Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Simmons v. Otis Elevator Co., 268 A.D. 808, 48 N.Y.S.2d 563, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3567 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by claimant from the decision of the State Industrial Board disallowing the claim of a crippled dependent son of the deceased employee on the ground that the third party action was discontinued without written consent of the employer and carrier and that the agreement to discontinue was entered into after the expiration of the two-year period, thereby denying the employer and carrier their right to subrogation. The Board made a factual finding that on January 29, 1942, by stipulation between the attorneys for the parties, “ the said action was discontinued after the expiration of the two-year period, without the written consent of the - employer and carrier, and the employer and carrier were deprived of their rights to subrogation ”, The sola issue is that of waiver and prejudice, a debatable question of fact which has been resolved by the Board in favor of the employer and carrier. ' This court is without power to direct the Board to decide the other way as a matter of law. (Matter of McGrinder v. Sullivan, 290 N. Y. 11.) In any event there is substantial evidence to sustain the finding of the Industrial Board, and the decision disallowing the claim should be affirmed and the claim dismissed, without costs. Decision of the State Industrial Board affirmed and claim dismissed, without costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by claimant from the decision of the State Industrial Board disallowing the claim of a crippled dependent son of the deceased employee on the ground that the third party action was discontinued without written consent of the employer and carrier and that the agreement to discontinue was entered into after the expiration of the two-year period, thereby denying the employer and carrier their right to subrogation. The Board made a factual finding that on January 29, 1942, by stipulation between the attorneys for the parties, “ the said action was discontinued after the expiration of the two-year period, without the written consent of the - employer and carrier, and the employer and carrier were deprived of their rights to subrogation ”, The sola issue is that of waiver and prejudice, a debatable question of fact which has been resolved by the Board in favor of the employer and carrier. ' This court is without power to direct the Board to decide the other way as a matter of law. (Matter of McGrinder v. Sullivan, 290 N. Y. 11.) In any event there is substantial evidence to sustain the finding of the Industrial Board, and the decision disallowing the claim should be affirmed and the claim dismissed, without costs. Decision of the State Industrial Board affirmed and claim dismissed, without costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 A.D. 808, 48 N.Y.S.2d 563, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-simmons-v-otis-elevator-co-nyappdiv-1944.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack