Claim of Silverman v. Roth

9 A.D.2d 591, 189 N.Y.S.2d 311, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7458

This text of 9 A.D.2d 591 (Claim of Silverman v. Roth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Silverman v. Roth, 9 A.D.2d 591, 189 N.Y.S.2d 311, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7458 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Opinion

— Appeal by an employer and his insurance carrier from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The board found that in falling from a ladder, in the course of his employment as a carpenter, decedent sustained accidental injuries in the nature of laceration of the lip and aggravation of a pre-existing cardiac condition, causing his immediate death due to coronary sclerosis and fibrosis of the myocardium.” Appellants dispute the findings of accident and causal relation. The occurrence of the unwitnessed fall was clearly established and substantial evidence attributed causation to it. Claimant’s cardiologist testified that decedent’s heart condition was so “aggravated by the shock of an accidental fall from the ladder” as to cause his death and that “ordinary effort * * * probably would not do this”. Asked if his opinion as to causation would he the same if “ a spasm started the fall”, he said that “the fall itself would aggravate the spasm and sort of snowball the effect. So whatever way you look at it the fall is an aggravating cause of what happened.” Upon this evidence the award was justified. (See Matter of Concilla v. Scrufari Constr. Co., 275 App. Div. 884, affd. 300 N. Y. 519; Matter of Connelly v. Samaritan Hosp., 259 N. Y. 137, 140; Matter of Young v. Waterbury, 286 App. Div. 900.) Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Bergan, J. P., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Connelly v. Samaritan Hospital
181 N.E. 76 (New York Court of Appeals, 1932)
Matter of Concilla v. Scrufari Construction Co., Inc.
89 N.E.2d 248 (New York Court of Appeals, 1949)
Claim of Barton v. Olympia Fashions, Inc.
286 A.D. 900 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 A.D.2d 591, 189 N.Y.S.2d 311, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-silverman-v-roth-nyappdiv-1959.