Claim of Siegfreid v. Goldberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Siegfreid v. Goldberg

175 A.D. 952

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 175 A.D. 952 (Claim of Siegfreid v. Goldberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Siegfreid v. Goldberg, 175 A.D. 952 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Kellogg, P. J. (dissenting):

Apparently the boiler referred to is the ordinary heater used in houses for furnishing hot water, and has no other use. It was probably larger than that in use in a single house, as there were five apartments to which the water was to be furnished; nevertheless it is the same kind of a boiler. I do not think that the man who builds a fire in a water heater in a house is within group 22,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kellogg, P. J. (dissenting):

Apparently the boiler referred to is the ordinary heater used in houses for furnishing hot water, and has no other use. It was probably larger than that in use in a single house, as there were five apartments to which the water was to be furnished; nevertheless it is the same kind of a boiler. I do not think that the man who builds a fire in a water heater in a house is within group 22,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 A.D. 952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-siegfreid-v-goldberg-nyappdiv-1916.