Claim of Shults v. Colonial Flying Service, Inc.
This text of 236 A.D. 867 (Claim of Shults v. Colonial Flying Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Award affirmed, with costs to the State [868]*868Industrial Board. Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Hill and Crapser, JJ., concur; Rhodes, J., dissents and votes to reverse award and to dismiss claim on the ground that the employee at the time of the accident was engaged in an enterprise for his own personal benefit and not connected with the business of the employer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
236 A.D. 867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-shults-v-colonial-flying-service-inc-nyappdiv-1932.