Claim of Shoemaker v. Jordan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Shoemaker v. Jordan

247 A.D. 835

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

Motion to reinstate appeal denied. Application to have appeal heard on typewritten record denied. The court has examined the minutes of the hearing and finds that an appeal to this court would be futile because only a question of fact was presented for determination and the finding of the Board is conclusive on the court. The court is in full accord with the finding of the Board and the evidence does not warrant any other conclusion. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to reinstate appeal denied. Application to have appeal heard on typewritten record denied. The court has examined the minutes of the hearing and finds that an appeal to this court would be futile because only a question of fact was presented for determination and the finding of the Board is conclusive on the court. The court is in full accord with the finding of the Board and the evidence does not warrant any other conclusion. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Claim of Shoemaker v. Jordan, 247 A.D. 835 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

247 A.D. 835 (Claim of Shoemaker v. Jordan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.