Claim of Senoff v. Savage Arms Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Senoff v. Savage Arms Corp.

236 A.D. 863

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 236 A.D. 863 (Claim of Senoff v. Savage Arms Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Senoff v. Savage Arms Corp., 236 A.D. 863 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Van Kirk, P. J., Hill and Rhodes, JJ., concur; Hinman, J., dissents and votes to reverse award and remit claim on the ground that there is no evidence to support the finding that the deceased employee “ suddenly inhaled a considerable dose of methyl bromide gas ” at the Russell home, and that the medical testimony as to causal relation between such accident and the death was partially based on facts not competently proven. MeNamee, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Van Kirk, P. J., Hill and Rhodes, JJ., concur; Hinman, J., dissents and votes to reverse award and remit claim on the ground that there is no evidence to support the finding that the deceased employee “ suddenly inhaled a considerable dose of methyl bromide gas ” at the Russell home, and that the medical testimony as to causal relation between such accident and the death was partially based on facts not competently proven. MeNamee, J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 A.D. 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-senoff-v-savage-arms-corp-nyappdiv-1932.