Claim of Seamon v. Landstrom Gravel Co.

401 N.E.2d 213, 48 N.Y.2d 923, 425 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2531
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 13, 1979
StatusPublished

This text of 401 N.E.2d 213 (Claim of Seamon v. Landstrom Gravel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Seamon v. Landstrom Gravel Co., 401 N.E.2d 213, 48 N.Y.2d 923, 425 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2531 (N.Y. 1979).

Opinion

[925]*925OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (65 AD2d 877). Even though the board’s determination is not unanimous, there must be an affirmance if there is substantial evidence to sustain its determination.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg. Judges Jasen and Meyer dissent and vote to reverse for reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum by Mr. Justice Robert G. Main at the Appellate Division (65 AD2d 877-878).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Seamon v. Landstrom Gravel Co.
65 A.D.2d 877 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
401 N.E.2d 213, 48 N.Y.2d 923, 425 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-seamon-v-landstrom-gravel-co-ny-1979.