Home/New York Court of Appeals/Claim of Seamon v. Landstrom Gravel Co.

Claim of Seamon v. Landstrom Gravel Co.

401 N.E.2d 213, 48 N.Y.2d 923, 425 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2531
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 13, 1979·Published

Opinion

[925]*925OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (65 AD2d 877). Even though the board’s determination is not unanimous, there must be an affirmance if there is substantial evidence to sustain its determination.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg. Judges Jasen and Meyer dissent and vote to reverse for reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum by Mr. Justice Robert G. Main at the Appellate Division (65 AD2d 877-878).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Seamon v. Landstrom Gravel Co., 401 N.E.2d 213, 48 N.Y.2d 923, 425 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2531 (N.Y. 1979).

401 N.E.2d 213 (Claim of Seamon v. Landstrom Gravel Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Seamon v. Landstrom Gravel Co.
65 A.D.2d 877 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)