Claim of Schwartz v. Jacobs Bros.

247 A.D. 848
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1936·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Appeal from an award of the State Industrial Board for the per[849] manent loss of twelve and one-half per cent of the use of the right leg. Claimant sustained a permanent injury to his right knee on April 8, 1931, the employer then having knowledge of the accident. He did not file claim for compensation until May 7, 1934, apparently for the reason that the injury was not at first regarded as serious. In behalf of the employer it was testified that the claimant did not in 1931 lose any time “ except half days here and there.” “ He was out several half days at a time for which he received regular pay.” This was when the accident first occurred, “ when he had to go to the doctor for treatments in the afternoon.” Later and in May, 1934, the injury became troublesome and he went to a hospital and was operated upon. The Board has found that although "written notice of injury v as not filed within the time prescribed by section 28 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, the bar of the statute has been waived by the employer and carrier since the employer made advance payments to the claimant from the date of the accident to the date of filing the claim. Section 25 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law provides for advance payments of compensation and requires such payments to be made whether or not an award has been made unless the claim is to be controverted. The appellants assert that there was no advance payment in this case within the meaning of the law, nor any such payments which waived the provisions of section 28. The payment of full wages to claimant in 1931 at the time he sustained his injury covering the period of time when he was then absent from work is deemed an advance payment sufficient to authorize the Board to entertain the claim and to make the award. Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Bliss and Hefíernan, JJ., concur; Crapser, J., dissents and votes to reverse the award and to dismiss the claim.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Schwartz v. Jacobs Bros., 247 A.D. 848 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

247 A.D. 848 (Claim of Schwartz v. Jacobs Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Brill v. Jacobson
41 A.D.2d 792 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1973)
Claim of Erne v. Ritter Co.
17 A.D.2d 668 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
McCabe Inspection Service, Inc. v. Willard
143 F. Supp. 393 (S.D. New York, 1956)
Smith v. Unity Industrial Life Ins. Co.
13 So. 2d 129 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1943)
Pittman v. Glencliff Dairy Products Co.
119 P.2d 470 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1941)