Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Claim of Schwartz v. Bernie's Tire & Battery Service

Claim of Schwartz v. Bernie's Tire & Battery Service

269 A.D. 792, 55 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3878
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 9, 1945
StatusPublished

This text of 269 A.D. 792 (Claim of Schwartz v. Bernie's Tire & Battery Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Schwartz v. Bernie's Tire & Battery Service, 269 A.D. 792, 55 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Opinion

Appeal by insurance [793]*793carrier from a decision of the State Industrial Board denying its application to reopen the case and to permit further hearings on the ground of newly-discovered evidence. Decision affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board, on the ground that it is purely interlocutory and not appealable. (See Matter of Foerg v. Sackett & Wilhelms Corp., 249 App. Div. 900.) All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Foerg v. Sackett & Wilhelms Corp.
249 A.D. 900 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D. 792, 55 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-schwartz-v-bernies-tire-battery-service-nyappdiv-1945.