Claim of Schwartz v. Bernie's Tire & Battery Service
269 A.D. 792, 55 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3878
Opinion
Appeal by insurance [793] carrier from a decision of the State Industrial Board denying its application to reopen the case and to permit further hearings on the ground of newly-discovered evidence. Decision affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board, on the ground that it is purely interlocutory and not appealable. (See Matter of Foerg v. Sackett & Wilhelms Corp., 249 App. Div. 900.) All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Schwartz v. Bernie's Tire & Battery Service, 269 A.D. 792, 55 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).
269 A.D. 792 (Claim of Schwartz v. Bernie's Tire & Battery Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claim of Foerg v. Sackett & Wilhelms Corp.
249 A.D. 900 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)