Claim of Schneider v. Durst Manufacturing Co.
265 A.D. 1022, 38 N.Y.S.2d 983, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6667
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 13, 1943·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
[1023]*1023The furnishing of the truss is a payment of compensation within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. (Matter of Patti v. Knickerbocker Fireproofing Co., 280 N. Y. 609; Matter of Gabrielli v. City of New York, 258 App. Div. 1015, leave to appeal denied, 282 N. Y. 809.) Decision reopening the case and order directing the carrier to provide a truss affirmed with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Sehenck, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Schneider v. Durst Manufacturing Co., 265 A.D. 1022, 38 N.Y.S.2d 983, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6667 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).
265 A.D. 1022 (Claim of Schneider v. Durst Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claim of Ramberg v. Dorn
12 A.D.2d 562 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)
Claim of Usherson v. Greeley Mills, Inc.
7 A.D.2d 809 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)