Claim of Schneider v. Durst Manufacturing Co.
This text of 265 A.D. 1022 (Claim of Schneider v. Durst Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[1023]*1023The furnishing of the truss is a payment of compensation within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. (Matter of Patti v. Knickerbocker Fireproofing Co., 280 N. Y. 609; Matter of Gabrielli v. City of New York, 258 App. Div. 1015, leave to appeal denied, 282 N. Y. 809.) Decision reopening the case and order directing the carrier to provide a truss affirmed with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Sehenck, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
265 A.D. 1022, 38 N.Y.S.2d 983, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-schneider-v-durst-manufacturing-co-nyappdiv-1943.