Claim of Scheidelman v. P. F. Scheidelman & Sons, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Scheidelman v. P. F. Scheidelman & Sons, Inc.

255 A.D. 906, 7 N.Y.S.2d 764, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5826

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 16, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D. 906 (Claim of Scheidelman v. P. F. Scheidelman & Sons, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Scheidelman v. P. F. Scheidelman & Sons, Inc., 255 A.D. 906, 7 N.Y.S.2d 764, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5826 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Deceased was employed by the employer as vice-president and salesman, and at the time of injury was inspecting a building which was being wrecked, with a view to the purchase of the used materials and again using them in the erection of a warehouse which the employer was about to construct. The employer was engaged in wholesale and retail sale of beer and ale. The policy covered salesmen, all business operations and operative management conducted at or from the employer’s place of business. The evidence justifies the finding that the policy covered the accident. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., McNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffeman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deceased was employed by the employer as vice-president and salesman, and at the time of injury was inspecting a building which was being wrecked, with a view to the purchase of the used materials and again using them in the erection of a warehouse which the employer was about to construct. The employer was engaged in wholesale and retail sale of beer and ale. The policy covered salesmen, all business operations and operative management conducted at or from the employer’s place of business. The evidence justifies the finding that the policy covered the accident. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., McNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffeman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D. 906, 7 N.Y.S.2d 764, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-scheidelman-v-p-f-scheidelman-sons-inc-nyappdiv-1938.