Claim of Schaubel v. Simons, Stewart & Foy, Inc.
This text of 236 A.D. 748 (Claim of Schaubel v. Simons, Stewart & Foy, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. All concur, except Van Kirk, P. J., who dissents on the ground that section 17 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law provides that a dependent is one “ whom the employee has supported, either wholly or in part, for the period of one year prior to the date of the accident.” This does not mean in this case that the father will be dependent if deceased supported him during the whole or part of a year, but means that he will be dependent if the deceased supported him during substantially the whole year prior to his death, during which time he furnished the father the [749]*749whole or part of his support. The evidence fails to support the claim under this section.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
236 A.D. 748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-schaubel-v-simons-stewart-foy-inc-nyappdiv-1932.