Claim of Schaeffer v. Buffalo Steel Car Co.

221 A.D. 808
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 15, 1927
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 221 A.D. 808 (Claim of Schaeffer v. Buffalo Steel Car Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Schaeffer v. Buffalo Steel Car Co., 221 A.D. 808 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

An award under paragraph u of subdivision 3 of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law cannot be appended to a schedule award. (Pinski v. Superior Fireproof Door & Sash Co., 209 App. Div. 305; Hinley v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 215 id. 857; Matter of Bernstein v. Hoffman, 219 id. 152.) If an award is proper in this case it may be made under said paragraph u for combined injuries to both arm and back, such award to date from the time of the accident, and appellants should be credited on such award with all payments made under the schedule award. Cochrane, P. J., Van Kirk, McCann, Davis and Whitmyer, JJ., concur. Award reversed and claim remitted, with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Carolan v. R. Hoe & Co.
225 A.D. 393 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)
Claim of Rubenstein v. Pechter Baking Co.
224 A.D. 324 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
221 A.D. 808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-schaeffer-v-buffalo-steel-car-co-nyappdiv-1927.