Claim of Sauer v. American Car & Foundry Co.

280 A.D. 1029, 116 N.Y.S.2d 810, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4602
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 1952·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by an employer and insurance carrier from decision and award made by the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The decision under appeal resulted from appellant’s application for the board’s review of a referee’s decision which had awarded disability compensation to claimant for reduced earnings on the basis of 80% disability. The board modified the referee’s decision and award to a lesser and tentative rate of compensation based upon 50% of disability, held adversely to appellant’s contention that claimant had unreasonably refused employer’s proffered offer of a sweeping job and continued the case to a referee’s calendar “for further consideration of the degree of claimant’s disability.” The contention of appellant that claimant unreasonably refused the sweeping job is based wholly upon physicians’ reports to the effect that he was able to perform light work and that it was advisable that he do so. Whether (lie proffered job was within the medical specifications was not developed by evidence by either of the parties in interest. Decision and award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Foster, P. J., Brewster, Bergan and Halpern, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Sauer v. American Car & Foundry Co., 280 A.D. 1029, 116 N.Y.S.2d 810, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4602 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

280 A.D. 1029 (Claim of Sauer v. American Car & Foundry Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rosinsky v. City of Binghamton
72 Misc. 2d 187 (New York Supreme Court, 1972)