Claim of Salli v. Standard Wrecking & Salvage Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Salli v. Standard Wrecking & Salvage Co.

254 A.D. 789, 4 N.Y.S.2d 70, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7623

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 4, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D. 789 (Claim of Salli v. Standard Wrecking & Salvage Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Salli v. Standard Wrecking & Salvage Co., 254 A.D. 789, 4 N.Y.S.2d 70, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7623 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an award made by the State Industrial Board. The employer was engaged in the business of wrecking automobiles and the claimant was employed as a pressman’s helper. On March 26, 1934, while engaged in his regular occupation the left forefinger of the claimant was crashed between a press-arm and bundle of a hydraulic press and as a result of said injuries the claimant was caused to suffer an infection which in turn lighted up, aggravated and accelerated a pre-existing dormant and tubercular condition. In consequence of the said injuries claimant was totally disabled for the period of the award on appeal. There was a dispute in the medical testimony and thereby a question of fact. The proof required to support the fin dings of the State Industrial Board and all evidence introduced into the record was properly transcribed and considered by the State Industrial Board. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffeman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an award made by the State Industrial Board. The employer was engaged in the business of wrecking automobiles and the claimant was employed as a pressman’s helper. On March 26, 1934, while engaged in his regular occupation the left forefinger of the claimant was crashed between a press-arm and bundle of a hydraulic press and as a result of said injuries the claimant was caused to suffer an infection which in turn lighted up, aggravated and accelerated a pre-existing dormant and tubercular condition. In consequence of the said injuries claimant was totally disabled for the period of the award on appeal. There was a dispute in the medical testimony and thereby a question of fact. The proof required to support the fin dings of the State Industrial Board and all evidence introduced into the record was properly transcribed and considered by the State Industrial Board. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffeman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 789, 4 N.Y.S.2d 70, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-salli-v-standard-wrecking-salvage-co-nyappdiv-1938.