Claim of Sachkowsky v. Gombert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Sachkowsky v. Gombert

256 A.D. 1018, 11 N.Y.S.2d 244, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5903

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D. 1018 (Claim of Sachkowsky v. Gombert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Sachkowsky v. Gombert, 256 A.D. 1018, 11 N.Y.S.2d 244, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by non-insured employer from a disability award. Appellant asserts that claimant was a partner with others; that such partnership was an independent contractor doing the work in question, and that he was, therefore, not an employee. The Board has found that claimant was not a partner or subcontractor and that the alleged contract of partnership was made and entered into for the sole purpose of avoiding the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law and the necessity of carrying compensation insurance. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — • Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffeman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by non-insured employer from a disability award. Appellant asserts that claimant was a partner with others; that such partnership was an independent contractor doing the work in question, and that he was, therefore, not an employee. The Board has found that claimant was not a partner or subcontractor and that the alleged contract of partnership was made and entered into for the sole purpose of avoiding the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law and the necessity of carrying compensation insurance. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — • Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffeman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D. 1018, 11 N.Y.S.2d 244, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-sachkowsky-v-gombert-nyappdiv-1939.