Claim of Rykala v. New York State Comptroller
This text of 92 A.D.3d 1077 (Claim of Rykala v. New York State Comptroller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
“For purposes of accidental disability retirement benefits, the underlying accident must be a sudden, fortuitous, out of the ordinary and unexpected event that does not result from an activity undertaken in the performance of regular or routine employment duties” (Matter of Welsh v New York State Comp[1078]*1078troller, 67 AD3d 1167, 1168 [2009], lv denied 14 NY3d 706 [2010] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). Here, petitioner acknowledged that his job duties included physically-restraining persons causing a disturbance in the courtroom. It is undisputed that petitioner’s injuries occurred while he was struggling with an unruly prisoner. Under the circumstances herein, substantial evidence supports the Comptroller’s determination and it will not be disturbed (see Matter of Olivera v New York State & Local Employees’ Retirement Sys., 82 AD3d 1434, 1434-1435 [2011]; Matter of Silver-Smith v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 298 AD2d 696, 697 [2002]).
Mercure, A.EJ., Peters, Malone Jr., Kavanagh and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 A.D.3d 1077, 937 N.Y.2d 754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-rykala-v-new-york-state-comptroller-nyappdiv-2012.