Claim of Ruby v. Lustig
This text of 274 A.D. 954 (Claim of Ruby v. Lustig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Award of compensation to an employee who, following extreme exertion and extension of his -arms in painting, suffered a cardiac attack. The evidence sustains the finding. Award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Foster and Russell, JJ., concur; Deyo, J., dissents, on the ground that the evidence does not support the conclusion and the findings of fact that .the claimant was engaged in any unusual work and exertion and there is no evidence to support a finding of accidental injuries arising out of and within the intent and meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
274 A.D. 954, 83 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-ruby-v-lustig-nyappdiv-1948.