Claim of Rubino v. City of New York
This text of 27 A.D.2d 588 (Claim of Rubino v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion to dismiss appeal as academic granted, respondent board having vacated the decision appealed during the pendency of the appeal. The subsequent decision may not be reviewed upon this appeal. (Cf. Matter of Williams v. Bowers, 24 A D 2d 1035; Matter of Veach v. County of Erie, 24 A D 2d 916; where, upon rehearing, the board adhered to its original decision.) Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 A.D.2d 588, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-rubino-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1966.