Claim of Rubino v. City of New York
27 A.D.2d 588, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2844
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 16, 1966·Published
Opinion
Motion to dismiss appeal as academic granted, respondent board having vacated the decision appealed during the pendency of the appeal. The subsequent decision may not be reviewed upon this appeal. (Cf. Matter of Williams v. Bowers, 24 A D 2d 1035; Matter of Veach v. County of Erie, 24 A D 2d 916; where, upon rehearing, the board adhered to its original decision.) Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Rubino v. City of New York, 27 A.D.2d 588, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2844 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).
27 A.D.2d 588 (Claim of Rubino v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Loper v. Suffolk County Water Auth.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026