Claim of Rowe v. Patrick McGovern, Inc.
This text of 257 A.D. 1095 (Claim of Rowe v. Patrick McGovern, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The facts are not in dispute. Claimant lost fifty per cent hearing of each ear. The Board has allowed a schedule loss under the first clause of paragraph “ m ” of subdivision 3 of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law for sixty weeks (thirty weeks for each ear). Claimant asserts that he is entitled to a schedule loss of seventy-five weeks under the latter part of paragraph “ m ” of subdivision 3 of section 15, one-half of 150 weeks allowed for loss of hearing of both ears. Award reversed for the purpose of making an award for seventy-five weeks, with costs to the claimant against the employer. The accident having occurred July 16, 1930, the delay is shocking. The court, therefore, in the interest of expedition, grants leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, and hereby certifies that the following question of law has arisen which in its opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: Is the claimant entitled to a schedule loss of seventy-five weeks under paragraphs “ m ” and “ s ” of subdivision 3, section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law? Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Schenck, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
257 A.D. 1095, 14 N.Y.S.2d 640, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-rowe-v-patrick-mcgovern-inc-nyappdiv-1939.