Claim of Rothkopf v. Benrus Watch Co.
266 A.D. 705, 40 N.Y.S.2d 215, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3962
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 10, 1943·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Rothkopf v. Benrus Watch Co., 266 A.D. 705, 40 N.Y.S.2d 215, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3962 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).
266 A.D. 705 (Claim of Rothkopf v. Benrus Watch Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claim of Martin v. C. A. Productions Co.
168 N.E.2d 666 (New York Court of Appeals, 1960)
Claim of Smith v. Venezian Lamp Co.
5 A.D.2d 12 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
Groff v. Uzzilia
1 A.D.2d 273 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
Claim of Tate v. Estate of Dickens
276 A.D.2d 94 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)
Claim of McSweeney v. Hammerlund Manufacturing Co.
275 A.D.2d 447 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)
Goldfarb v. Herman
193 Misc. 302 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)
In re Roseland Amusement Co.
269 A.D. 713 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)
Claim of Martin v. Plaut
267 A.D. 929 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)