Claim of Rosky v. Cadillac Motor Car Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Rosky v. Cadillac Motor Car Co.

259 A.D. 772, 18 N.Y.S.2d 252, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6596

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1940·Published

Opinion

Claimant has an award for permanent total disability arising from blindness in both eyes. The evidence sustains the finding that the blindness resulted from monoxide poisoning contracted while testing a large number of automobile motors each day in an illy ventilated room. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present ■ — ■ Hill, P. J.i Crapser, Bliss, Hefiernan and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claimant has an award for permanent total disability arising from blindness in both eyes. The evidence sustains the finding that the blindness resulted from monoxide poisoning contracted while testing a large number of automobile motors each day in an illy ventilated room. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present ■ — ■ Hill, P. J.i Crapser, Bliss, Hefiernan and Foster, JJ.

Claim of Rosky v. Cadillac Motor Car Co., 259 A.D. 772, 18 N.Y.S.2d 252, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6596 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

259 A.D. 772 (Claim of Rosky v. Cadillac Motor Car Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.