Claim of Rosa v. Britt Fast Freight, Inc.
This text of 266 A.D.2d 603 (Claim of Rosa v. Britt Fast Freight, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed March 10, 1998, which discharged the Special Disability Fund from liability.
Claimant’s husband, a truck driver, sustained a fatal heart attack while making a delivery in the course of his employment. The employer and its workers’ compensation carrier contested claimant’s claim for death benefits and filed a claim for reimbursement from the Special Disability Fund pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 15 (8). The Workers’ Compensation Board discharged the Fund, concluding that there is a lack of evidence of a preexisting physical impairment which would have been a hindrance to claimant’s employment. The employer and carrier appeal.
Where, as here, there is medical evidence of preexisting heart disease, but there is nothing in the record to establish that decedent’s heart disease hindered his job potential in any way, the Board’s decision to discharge the Fund must be affirmed (see, Matter of Brigandi v Town & Country Linoleum & Carpet, 221 AD2d 728). We reject the carrier’s contention that because the preexisting condition contributed to decedent’s death, it necessarily hindered decedent’s job potential. Pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 15 (8) (e), the Fund could not be liable unless decedent’s death “would not have occurred except for such pre-existing permanent physical impairment”. Thus, [604]*604the additional requirement that preexisting impairment hindered job potential (see, Workers’ Compensation Law § 15 [8] [b]; Matter of Sturtevant v Broome County, 188 AD2d 893) requires something more than evidence that the preexisting impairment contributed to decedent’s death.
Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
266 A.D.2d 603, 698 N.Y.S.2d 65, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-rosa-v-britt-fast-freight-inc-nyappdiv-1999.