Claim of Romano v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Romano v. City of New York

263 A.D. 1030, 33 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7955

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 11, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D. 1030 (Claim of Romano v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Romano v. City of New York, 263 A.D. 1030, 33 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7955 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

The city of New York,, a self-insured employer, has appealed from an award of the State Industrial Board in claimant’s favor. The sole question is whether or not the award is properly made against the city or whether it should have been made against the Special Fund under the provisions of section 25-a of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. On November 16, 1927, while claimant was engaged in his regular occupation,, he received injuries which caused an epigastric hernia which required operative-interference. In January, 1930, he suffered a recurrent hernia which made a second operation necessary. A third operation became necessary in November, 1940, The Board found that between the years 1930 and 1939 the appellant, furnished claimant with four or five trass belts, the last of which was furnished claimant on July 10, 1939. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The city of New York,, a self-insured employer, has appealed from an award of the State Industrial Board in claimant’s favor. The sole question is whether or not the award is properly made against the city or whether it should have been made against the Special Fund under the provisions of section 25-a of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. On November 16, 1927, while claimant was engaged in his regular occupation,, he received injuries which caused an epigastric hernia which required operative-interference. In January, 1930, he suffered a recurrent hernia which made a second operation necessary. A third operation became necessary in November, 1940, The Board found that between the years 1930 and 1939 the appellant, furnished claimant with four or five trass belts, the last of which was furnished claimant on July 10, 1939. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Foster, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 1030, 33 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-romano-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1942.