Claim of Roggia v. Town of Blooming Grove

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Roggia v. Town of Blooming Grove

74 A.D.2d 666, 424 N.Y.S.2d 768, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10348

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 74 A.D.2d 666 (Claim of Roggia v. Town of Blooming Grove) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Roggia v. Town of Blooming Grove, 74 A.D.2d 666, 424 N.Y.S.2d 768, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10348 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed February 23, 1979, which affirmed an award of compensation benefits to claimant based upon the board’s earlier finding that claimant had suffered a compensable myocardial infarction. In its earlier decision, which was filed on August 15, 1978 and upon which the award of compensation benefits was based, the majority of the board found: "based on the testimony of Dr. Garner and Dr. Davachi and the claimant’s testimony * * * claimant’s argument on August 31, 1976 aggravated a pre-existing heart condition resulting in a myocardial infarction arising out of and in the course of his employment.” Substantial evidence supports this determination of the board. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board against the employer and its insurance carrier. Sweeney, J. P., Kane, Staley, Jr., Main and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed February 23, 1979, which affirmed an award of compensation benefits to claimant based upon the board’s earlier finding that claimant had suffered a compensable myocardial infarction. In its earlier decision, which was filed on August 15, 1978 and upon which the award of compensation benefits was based, the majority of the board found: "based on the testimony of Dr. Garner and Dr. Davachi and the claimant’s testimony * * * claimant’s argument on August 31, 1976 aggravated a pre-existing heart condition resulting in a myocardial infarction arising out of and in the course of his employment.” Substantial evidence supports this determination of the board. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board against the employer and its insurance carrier. Sweeney, J. P., Kane, Staley, Jr., Main and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 A.D.2d 666, 424 N.Y.S.2d 768, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-roggia-v-town-of-blooming-grove-nyappdiv-1980.